Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
69 Imaging
51 Features
47 Overall
49
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 580g - 123 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched December 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the K-x (12MP) is fairly similar but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and K-x (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-1 was unveiled 14 months after the K-x making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-x being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the K-x in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax K-x. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Pentax K-x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Pentax K-x
| XZ-1 | K-x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | December 2009 | More modern by 14 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-x over the Olympus XZ-1
| K-x | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax K-x
| XZ-1 | K-x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 provides physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-x has measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the K-x.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and K-x is 88 and 69 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and K-x.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-x will offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent XZ-1 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K-x Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax K-x | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax K-x |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2011-01-26 | 2009-12-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | Prime |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 614k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 16.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 416 (24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lb) | 580 gr (1.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 123 x 92 x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 34 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | 811 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | 1900 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $567 | $600 |