Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K20D
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
59 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K20D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Superseded the Pentax K10D
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K20D Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax K20D, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and K20D (15MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and K20D (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-1 was announced 2 years later than the K20D and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K20D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the K20D with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K20D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax K20D. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Pentax K20D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Pentax K20D
| XZ-1 | K20D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | June 2008 | More recent by 32 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K20D over the Olympus XZ-1
| K20D | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax K20D
| XZ-1 | K20D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K20D Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 offers outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Pentax K20D has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax K20D in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 against the K20D.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and K20D is 88 and 59 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K20D Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and K20D.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Pentax K20D will provide extra detail with its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The newer XZ-1 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K20D Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax K20D Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax K20D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax K20D |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2008-06-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4672 x 3104 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 614k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 34 | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | 639 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $567 | $700 |