Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-1 GPS (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-1 was announced 6 months earlier than the WG-1 GPS so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the XZ-1 scores vs the WG-1 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
| XZ-1 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus XZ-1
| WG-1 GPS | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
| XZ-1 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | August 2011 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 provides exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 GPS has specifications of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-1 versus the WG-1 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and WG-1 GPS is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WG-1 GPS.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-1 GPS will produce extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-26 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 614k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | OLED | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | 260 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $567 | $350 |
