Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-2
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus XZ-1 versus Pentax WG-2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-2 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-1 was unveiled 12 months before the WG-2 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the XZ-1 grades against the WG-2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Pentax WG-2
| XZ-1 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus XZ-1
| WG-2 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax WG-2
| XZ-1 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 has physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Pentax WG-2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-1 and the WG-2.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and WG-2 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and WG-2.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Pentax WG-2 will result in more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | OLED | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | 260 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $567 | $350 |