Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is very well matched but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and CX2 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-1 was unveiled 18 months later than the CX2 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-1 matches up against the CX2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 & Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh CX2
XZ-1 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | August 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus XZ-1
CX2 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh CX2
XZ-1 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the CX2.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and CX2 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and CX2.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus XZ-1 will give greater detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent XZ-1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh CX2 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 185g (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $567 | $341 |