Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is very well matched but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and CX2 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-1 was unveiled 18 months later than the CX2 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-1 matches up against the CX2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 & Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh CX2
| XZ-1 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | August 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus XZ-1
| CX2 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh CX2
| XZ-1 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the CX2.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and CX2 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and CX2.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus XZ-1 will give greater detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent XZ-1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 185g (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $567 | $341 |