Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is very well matched but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and CX2 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-1 was unveiled 18 months later than the CX2 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-1 matches up against the CX2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 & Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh CX2
| XZ-1 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | August 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus XZ-1
| CX2 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh CX2
| XZ-1 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the CX2.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and CX2 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and CX2.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus XZ-1 will give greater detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent XZ-1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 185g (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $567 | $341 |