Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and CX4 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XZ-1 was introduced 6 months later than the CX4 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the CX4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh CX4

 XZ-1 CX4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus XZ-1

 CX4 XZ-1 
Screen resolution920k614kSharper screen (+306k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh CX4

 XZ-1 CX4 
IntroducedJanuary 2011August 2010Similar generation
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 provides physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-1 and the CX4.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and CX4 is 88 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and CX4.

To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The XZ-1 has the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-1
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX4
45
has manual focus
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
low MP (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
26
manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Street photography factors
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/1.63")
heavier than competition in class (275 grams)
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography highlights
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
better than average battery life (320 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
does not have phase detect autofocus
24
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography factors
62
better than average battery life (320 shots)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (275g)
low MP (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
66
lighter than competition (205g)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography details
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography details
54
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (320 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
does not have Time Lapse mode
42
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging factors
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging factors
31
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic port
heavier than competition in class (275 grams)
30
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh CX4
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh CX4
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh CX4
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-01-26 2010-08-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3664 x 2752 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 614 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275 grams (0.61 lb) 205 grams (0.45 lb)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $567 $211