Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh G900
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh G900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and G900 (20MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and G900 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-1 was released 8 years earlier than the G900 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-1 scores versus the G900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh G900
XZ-1 | G900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus XZ-1
G900 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | January 2011 | Newer by 86 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 614k | Crisper screen (+426k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh G900
XZ-1 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 has got exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh G900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 against the G900.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and G900 is 88 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and G900.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh G900 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh G900 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-01-26 | 2018-02-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 614k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 340 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $567 | $752 |