Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The XZ-1 was revealed 7 months before the GR Digital IV and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the XZ-1 grades vs the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
XZ-1 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus XZ-1
GR Digital IV | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 7 months |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper screen (+616k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
XZ-1 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 has outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 against the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c33df/c33dfed69a1c5308d46d336de6c914b69f9d3652" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and GR Digital IV is 88 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87fce/87fce002305bb086df2d0c95765c981c0c263627" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing specs. The picture underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and GR Digital IV.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical MP albeit different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 contains the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged XZ-1 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53170/53170e7682331e236a17e427e419014d4f62c8a0" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3abc/d3abc5f05f3e1b012a3f8c3cd96153c175a30e08" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 614k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 390 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $567 | $599 |