Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
51
Overall
40
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
58
Features
55
Overall
56

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Revealed June 2015
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Overview

Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GR II, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and GR II (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GR II (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XZ-1 was announced 5 years before the GR II and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the GR II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh GR II

 XZ-1 GR II 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus XZ-1

 GR II XZ-1 
RevealedJune 2015January 2011More recent by 53 months
Display resolution1230k614kClearer display (+616k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GR II

 XZ-1 GR II 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 features physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

See the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GR II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-1 and the GR II.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and GR II is 88 and 89 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and GR II.

Clearly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR II will result in more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older XZ-1 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR II Portrait photography highlights
44
manual focus
features face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.63")
74
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography features
Ricoh GR II Street photography features
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/1.63")
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
74
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR II Sports photography details
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
good battery (320 shots)
slow frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.63")
does not have phase detect autofocus
50
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking focus
fixed focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR II Travel photography highlights
62
good battery (320 shots)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
resolution not great (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
67
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography info
54
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
good battery (320 CIPA)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.63")
lack of Timelapse function
59
you can focus manually
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging details
Ricoh GR II Vlogging details
31
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (275 grams)
32
features face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
does not have microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh GR II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh GR II
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-01-26 2015-06-17
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V GR Engine V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" APS-C
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3664 x 2752 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 6400 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.8-16.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 614k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 300 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275 grams (0.61 lb) 251 grams (0.55 lb)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 34 80
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 13.7
DXO Low light rating 117 1078
Other
Battery life 320 images 320 images
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $567 $599