Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
89 Imaging
58 Features
55 Overall
56
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GR II, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and GR II (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GR II (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-1 was announced 5 years before the GR II and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the GR II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GR II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh GR II
| XZ-1 | GR II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus XZ-1
| GR II | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2015 | January 2011 | More recent by 53 months | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 614k | Clearer display (+616k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GR II
| XZ-1 | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 features physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GR II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-1 and the GR II.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and GR II is 88 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and GR II.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR II will result in more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older XZ-1 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh GR II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh GR II |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2015-06-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic V | GR Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-16.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 300 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lb) | 251 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 34 | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | 1078 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | 320 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $567 | $599 |