Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The XZ-1 was revealed 15 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the XZ-1 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 XZ-1 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
LaunchedJanuary 2011November 2009More modern by 15 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus XZ-1

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro XZ-1 
Screen resolution920k614kClearer screen (+306k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 XZ-1 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 88 and 77 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Clearly, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The newer XZ-1 provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography advice
45
manual focus
has face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.63")
55
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low MP (12 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography information
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/1.63")
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
62
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography details
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
good battery (320 shots)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.63")
no phase detect AF
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
low battery pack (320 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography advice
62
good battery (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
49
flash built-in
low battery pack (320 shots)
low MP (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Landscape photography camera
54
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
good battery (320 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.63")
missing Timelapse mode
46
has manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inch)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
low battery pack (320 per charge)
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging details
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
20
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2011-01-26 2009-11-10
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3664 x 2752 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 50mm (1x)
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 614k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275g (0.61 pounds) 453g (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures 320 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $567 $566