Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-1 was revealed 15 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the XZ-1 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
XZ-1 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | November 2009 | More modern by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus XZ-1
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
XZ-1 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 88 and 77 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The newer XZ-1 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $567 | $566 |