Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
51
Overall
40
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The XZ-1 was released 12 months prior to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the XZ-1 scores vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 XZ-1 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus XZ-1

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 XZ-1 
RevealedFebruary 2012January 2011More modern by 12 months
Screen resolution920k614kClearer screen (+306k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 XZ-1 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 features outside measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 88 and 69 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Plainly, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography features
44
focusing manually
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
73
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
Street photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
heavier than competition (275g)
55
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (550 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography features
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery (320 shots)
low fps (2.0 frames/s)
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
lacks phase detect AF
48
decent MP (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography highlights
62
better than average battery (320 shots)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (275g)
low MP (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
58
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
more heavy than competition in class (550g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography advice
54
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (320 CIPA)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
62
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
decent MP (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging advice
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging advice
31
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition (275 grams)
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
offers face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (550 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2011-01-26 2012-02-02
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" APS-C
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3664 x 2752 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 4.5 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 614 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech OLED TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275 gr (0.61 lbs) 550 gr (1.21 lbs)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs 400 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $567 $871