Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41


88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Released September 2010

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is pretty close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.

The XZ-1 was announced 5 months later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-1 grades against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
XZ-1 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus XZ-1
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
XZ-1 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | September 2010 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 has outside measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-1 and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 88 and 88 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The photograph here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
All in all, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 614k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | OLED | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 140g (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 320 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $567 | $566 |