Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
51
Overall
40
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Announced October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-30 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The XZ-1 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WG-30 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the XZ-1 grades versus the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-30

 XZ-1 WG-30 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kSharper display (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus XZ-1

 WG-30 XZ-1 
AnnouncedOctober 2014January 2011Fresher by 45 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-30

 XZ-1 WG-30 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-1 vs the WG-30.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and WG-30 is 88 and 91 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The visual here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WG-30.

To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 having a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-30 will resolve greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography features
Ricoh WG-30 Portrait photography features
44
you can focus manually
has face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
35
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-30 Street photography factors
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/1.63")
heavier than competition (275g)
61
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-1
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-30
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
good battery pack (320 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
has no phase detect AF
45
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Travel photography camera
62
good battery pack (320 per charge)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (275g)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-30
54
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
good battery pack (320 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
lack of Time Lapse mode
43
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Vlogging camera
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
heavier than competition (275 grams)
33
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-30
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh WG-30
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2011-01-26 2014-10-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3664 x 2752 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 614 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275 grams (0.61 lb) 192 grams (0.42 lb)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images 300 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $567 $428