Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40


91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-30 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

The XZ-1 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WG-30 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the XZ-1 grades versus the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Ricoh WG-30. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-30
XZ-1 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus XZ-1
WG-30 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 45 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-30
XZ-1 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-1 vs the WG-30.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and WG-30 is 88 and 91 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The visual here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WG-30.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 having a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-30 will resolve greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $567 | $428 |