Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
  • Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XZ-1 was manufactured 4 years before the WG-4 GPS which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XZ-1 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 XZ-1 WG-4 GPS 
Display resolution614k460kSharper display (+154k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus XZ-1

 WG-4 GPS XZ-1 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2011More modern by 36 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 XZ-1 WG-4 GPS 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 offers outside measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and WG-4 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and WG-4 GPS.

As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will give you greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-1
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
45
has manual focus
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.63")
41
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
features face detect focusing
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography information
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/1.63")
more heavy than average (275 grams)
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than others in class (235 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography highlights
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
good battery (320 per charge)
low frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.63")
no phase detect auto focus
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
environment proof
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames per second)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (240 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography advice
62
good battery (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (275 grams)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
69
environment proof
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
more heavy than others in class (235 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
54
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (320 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.63")
missing Timelapse recording
54
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
terrible battery life (240 shots)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging information
31
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone socket
more heavy than average (275 grams)
34
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (235g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2011-01-26 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3664 x 2752 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 614 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech OLED TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275 gr (0.61 lb) 235 gr (0.52 lb)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots 240 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $567 $210