Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

The XZ-1 was manufactured 4 years before the WG-4 GPS which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XZ-1 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
XZ-1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus XZ-1
WG-4 GPS | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
XZ-1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 offers outside measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and WG-4 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and WG-4 GPS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will give you greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | OLED | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 240 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $567 | $210 |