Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh WG-5 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
44
Overall
42

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview

The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-1 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the XZ-1 matches up against the WG-5 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 XZ-1 WG-5 GPS 
Screen resolution614k460kSharper screen (+154k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus XZ-1

 WG-5 GPS XZ-1 
ReleasedFebruary 2015January 2011Newer by 49 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 XZ-1 WG-5 GPS 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 has got exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).

Compare the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the WG-5 GPS.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and WG-5 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WG-5 GPS.

Clearly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will offer you extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Portrait photography info
45
manual focus
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
41
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
Street photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
more heavy than competitors (275g)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competition (236g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
great battery life (320 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
does not have phase detect autofocus
49
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-1
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
62
great battery life (320 CIPA)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (275 grams)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
69
environment sealing
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 shots)
more heavy than competition (236g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
54
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (320 shots)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
no Timelapse recording
54
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery life (240 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-1
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
31
quite wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
does not have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (275g)
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing microphone support
more heavy than competition (236 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh WG-5 GPS
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2011-01-26 2015-02-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3664 x 2752 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 614k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 10.40 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275g (0.61 lbs) 236g (0.52 lbs)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos 240 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $567 $500