Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The XZ-1 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the XZ-1 matches up against the WG-5 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
XZ-1 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus XZ-1
WG-5 GPS | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 49 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
XZ-1 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 has got exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65e07/65e075a3d82539be1094b44acac87decb19984a6" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and WG-5 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68a19/68a1993d143cf52b9b3bb961f724d6b0fbd126b5" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will offer you extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91f57/91f57cb93982e2b9e9dcf4d555fe6f82fe0cf8de" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebeed/ebeed453a0c00c8cf0b753f807ef8b33edb7492d" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 614k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 236g (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 240 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $567 | $500 |