Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched May 2017
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-50 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-1 was brought out 7 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-50

 XZ-1 WG-50 
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus XZ-1

 WG-50 XZ-1 
LaunchedMay 2017January 2011More modern by 77 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-50

 XZ-1 WG-50 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 has external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-1 versus the WG-50.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WG-50 is 88 and 91 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The image below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WG-50.

As you have seen, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-50 will deliver extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography highlights
45
has manual focus
supports face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
42
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography details
Ricoh WG-50 Street photography details
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
heavier than average (275 grams)
62
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography information
Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography information
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery life (320 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect autofocus
49
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Travel photography camera
62
good battery life (320 shots)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (275 grams)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
71
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Landscape photography camera
54
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (320 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
lack of Time Lapse mode
48
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging information
31
decently wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
does not offer selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than average (275 grams)
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-50
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh WG-50
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2011-01-26 2017-05-24
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3664 x 2752 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 614k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in On, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275 gr (0.61 pounds) 193 gr (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures 300 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $567 $280