Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-50 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-1 was brought out 7 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-50
XZ-1 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus XZ-1
WG-50 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | January 2011 | More modern by 77 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-50
XZ-1 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 has external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-1 versus the WG-50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WG-50 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The image below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WG-50.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-50 will deliver extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $567 | $280 |