Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-70
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-70 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-1 was announced 10 years earlier than the WG-70 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the XZ-1 grades versus the WG-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-70
XZ-1 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus XZ-1
WG-70 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | January 2011 | More modern by 109 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-70
XZ-1 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-70 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the WG-70.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WG-70 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and WG-70.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 using its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh WG-70 will give you greater detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2020-02-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 300 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $567 | $280 |