Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-M1
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-1 was launched 4 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-1 matches up against the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| XZ-1 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 115k | Clearer display (+499k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus XZ-1
| WG-M1 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 44 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh WG-M1
| XZ-1 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 offers external measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 and the WG-M1.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and WG-M1 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The pic below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-26 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $567 | $2,000 |