Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
![Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-XZ-1/Olympus-XZ-1-front.jpg)
![Samsung DV150F front Samsung DV150F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-DV150F/Samsung-DV150F-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus XZ-1 versus Samsung DV150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and DV150F (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and DV150F (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The XZ-1 was manufactured 23 months before the DV150F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the DV150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung DV150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung DV150F
XZ-1 | DV150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus XZ-1
DV150F | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 23 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung DV150F
XZ-1 | DV150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 offers outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Samsung DV150F has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-1 versus Samsung DV150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-1 vs the DV150F.
![Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-XZ-1-vs-Samsung-DV150F-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and DV150F is 88 and 96 respectively.
![Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-XZ-1-vs-Samsung-DV150F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The photograph below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and DV150F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung DV150F will produce greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older XZ-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
![Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-XZ-1-vs-Samsung-DV150F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-XZ-1-vs-Samsung-DV150F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung DV150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung DV150F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | OLED | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $567 | $150 |