Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5098/a50987fbe1d3aed59d1942e6a355078ee6cfb4f2" alt="Samsung GX-20 front Samsung GX-20 front"
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Announced January 2008
- Earlier Model is Samsung GX-10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung GX-20, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and GX-20 (15MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GX-20 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-1 was unveiled 3 years later than the GX-20 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the XZ-1 grades vs the GX-20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 & Samsung GX-20. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung GX-20
XZ-1 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2008 | More recent by 37 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Olympus XZ-1
GX-20 | XZ-1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung GX-20
XZ-1 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 has outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-20 has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung GX-20 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 against the GX-20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91def/91defd3923f31382d888562c7e3fc90b9a4098f1" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and GX-20 is 88 and 58 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a4e0/7a4e05bd838ebbc27c9efdd2a3084fd07fa9a527" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and GX-20.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung GX-20 will result in greater detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher XZ-1 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03dbf/03dbfc00f60929a9102b0f1409753a43abb6e5cc" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da513/da513d3ca20765449b0d672fc40cfd9bbde7aed0" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung GX-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung GX-20 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2008-01-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4688 x 3120 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lb) | 800 gr (1.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 34 | 68 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | 714 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $567 | $850 |