Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung MV800
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41


97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Released September 2011

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung MV800, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and MV800 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

The XZ-1 was released 7 months prior to the MV800 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the XZ-1 grades vs the MV800 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung MV800. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung MV800
XZ-1 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus XZ-1
MV800 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 7 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung MV800
XZ-1 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 features physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung MV800 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the MV800.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and MV800 is 88 and 97 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The picture here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and MV800.
All in all, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung MV800 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung MV800 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2011-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Micro SD |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $567 | $499 |