Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a7c2/5a7c200f7198b7d871a7cc0f294d85a2774e776e" alt="Samsung NX1100 front Samsung NX1100 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
60 Overall
61
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX1000
- Updated by Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and NX1100 (20MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and NX1100 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-1 was released 3 years prior to the NX1100 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the XZ-1 scores against the NX1100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung NX1100. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Samsung NX1100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung NX1100
XZ-1 | NX1100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1100 over the Olympus XZ-1
NX1100 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 26 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper screen (+307k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung NX1100
XZ-1 | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 provides outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Samsung NX1100 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 vs the NX1100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55fcb/55fcba0cbe8215f1a7d8eaa349eede2844b11707" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and NX1100 is 88 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18c54/18c54fbeab756cbaf4be2e6f9071aad448a63e45" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The graphic here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and NX1100.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung NX1100 will show more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older XZ-1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/436c8/436c8aa25174e57799cdcf7bc5637d09f668493c" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c5df/4c5df4d763a2c6c935626a3fd78c1ed5137d3633" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung NX1100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung NX1100 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2013-04-11 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | OLED | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | 852 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 320 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $567 | $600 |