Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX200
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced February 2012
- Superseded the Samsung NX100
- Later Model is Samsung NX210
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung NX200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and NX200 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-1 was announced 13 months earlier than the NX200 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the NX200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Samsung NX200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung NX200
| XZ-1 | NX200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Olympus XZ-1
| NX200 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 13 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung NX200
| XZ-1 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 614k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 provides physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung NX200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 against the NX200.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and NX200 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and NX200.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX200 will give more detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung NX200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lb) | 223 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 34 | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | 330 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $567 | $818 |