Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Previous Model is Samsung NX210
- Successor is Samsung NX500
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and NX300 (APS-C) use different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-1 was released 3 years prior to the NX300 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-1 grades vs the NX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung NX300
XZ-1 | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus XZ-1
NX300 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 34 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 768k | 614k | Sharper display (+154k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung NX300
XZ-1 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 features physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 and the NX300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and NX300 is 88 and 86 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The pic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and NX300.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX300 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 614k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | OLED | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) | 331 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $567 | $750 |