Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102

Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
51
Overall
40
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
21
Overall
27

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
  • Alternative Name is ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus XZ-1 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and SL102 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-1 was announced 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XZ-1 scores versus the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung SL102

 XZ-1 SL102 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011January 2009Fresher by 25 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution614k230kSharper screen (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus XZ-1

 SL102 XZ-1 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL102

 XZ-1 SL102 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 offers outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-1 versus Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-1 versus the SL102.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and SL102 is 88 and 96 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and SL102.

Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 includes the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The younger XZ-1 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography info
44
you can focus manually
comes with face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
24
provides face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
Street photography with Samsung SL102
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
more heavy than competitors (275 grams)
55
lighter than competitors (116g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-1
Sports photography with Samsung SL102
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
good battery life (320 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-1
Travel photography with Samsung SL102
62
good battery life (320 per charge)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (275 grams)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
61
lighter than competitors (116g)
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Landscape photography camera
54
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (320 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
missing Timelapse recording
26
fast max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging factors
Samsung SL102 Vlogging factors
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
does not have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone port
more heavy than competitors (275 grams)
29
fast max aperture (f)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors (116 grams)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL102
 Olympus XZ-1Samsung SL102
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Samsung SL102
Alternative name - ES55
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-01-26 2009-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3664 x 2752 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.5"
Resolution of screen 614k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275g (0.61 lbs) 116g (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $567 $130