Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus XZ-1 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and SL102 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-1 was announced 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XZ-1 scores versus the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung SL102
| XZ-1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 25 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus XZ-1
| SL102 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL102
| XZ-1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 offers outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-1 versus Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-1 versus the SL102.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and SL102 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and SL102.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 includes the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The younger XZ-1 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternative name | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 614k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $567 | $130 |