Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL202
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly similar but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and SL202 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-1 was brought out 24 months later than the SL202 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-1 matches up versus the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung SL202
| XZ-1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 24 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus XZ-1
| SL202 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL202
| XZ-1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 comes with external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the SL202.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and SL202 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The visual here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and SL202.
Plainly, both cameras provide the same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 has the larger sensor which should make getting bokeh easier. The more recent XZ-1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $567 | $140 |