Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB150F
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Samsung WB150F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WB150F (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-1 was unveiled 11 months earlier than the WB150F and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the WB150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Samsung WB150F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung WB150F
| XZ-1 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Olympus XZ-1
| WB150F | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB150F
| XZ-1 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 provides outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 versus Samsung WB150F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 vs the WB150F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and WB150F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and WB150F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung WB150F will deliver more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older XZ-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung WB150F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-26 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 614k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | OLED | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) | 188 gr (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $567 | $230 |