Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB250F
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WB250F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-1 was announced 23 months earlier than the WB250F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the XZ-1 grades versus the WB250F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung WB250F
XZ-1 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus XZ-1
WB250F | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 23 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB250F
XZ-1 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 has got external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the WB250F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WB250F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and WB250F.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB250F will produce extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung WB250F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 614k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | OLED | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $567 | $250 |