Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41


92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WB800F (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

The XZ-1 was unveiled 23 months prior to the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-1 matches up versus the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung WB800F
XZ-1 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus XZ-1
WB800F | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 23 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB800F
XZ-1 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 has got exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-1 and the WB800F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WB800F is 88 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and WB800F.
Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB800F will give you greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung WB800F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-01-26 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | OLED | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $567 | $300 |