Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Released January 2011
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WB800F (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XZ-1 was unveiled 23 months prior to the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-1 matches up versus the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung WB800F

 XZ-1 WB800F 
Screen resolution614k460kCrisper screen (+154k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus XZ-1

 WB800F XZ-1 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2011Newer by 23 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB800F

 XZ-1 WB800F 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 has got exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-1 and the WB800F.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WB800F is 88 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and WB800F.

Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB800F will give you greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
45
you can focus manually
comes with face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
43
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography advice
Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
heavier than others in class (275g)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (218g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
better than average battery pack (320 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect autofocus
52
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
62
better than average battery pack (320 per charge)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (275 grams)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than others (218g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography features
54
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (320 CIPA)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
no Time Lapse recording
49
focusing manually
really wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB800F Vlogging advice
31
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
heavier than others in class (275g)
35
really wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (218g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB800F
 Olympus XZ-1Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Samsung WB800F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-01-26 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 3664 x 2752 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 614 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech OLED TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275g (0.61 pounds) 218g (0.48 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $567 $300