Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
66
Features
62
Overall
64

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Released October 2008
  • Renewed by Sony A99
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Overview

In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and A900 (25MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and A900 (Full frame) use totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The XZ-1 was released 2 years later than the A900 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the XZ-1 grades vs the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony A900

 XZ-1 A900 
ReleasedJanuary 2011October 2008Fresher by 28 months

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus XZ-1

 A900 XZ-1 
Display resolution922k614kCrisper display (+308k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A900

 XZ-1 A900 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 provides physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony A900 has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 versus the A900.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and A900 is 88 and 54 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and A900.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony A900 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 15MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern XZ-1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-1
Portrait photography with Sony A900
45
manual focus
comes with face detection focus
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
71
you can focus manually
megapixel count high (25 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
Street photography with Sony A900
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
more heavy than average (275g)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment proof
no articulating screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography factors
Sony A900 Sports photography factors
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (320 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
lacks phase detect auto focus
70
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count high (25MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames per second)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography info
Sony A900 Travel photography info
62
better than average battery power (320 CIPA)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (275 grams)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
54
environment proof
megapixel count high (25MP)
no Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
Landscape photography with Sony A900
54
manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (320 shots)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
72
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count high (25 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment proof
two card slots
no liveview feature
no Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A900 as a Vlogging camera
31
rather wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than average (275 grams)
9
no video shooting
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A900
 Olympus XZ-1Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus XZ-1 Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2011-01-26 2008-10-22
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" Full frame
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 25 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3664 x 2752 6048 x 4032
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Available lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 4.5 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 614 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech OLED TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275 grams (0.61 pounds) 895 grams (1.97 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 34 79
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 12.3
DXO Low light score 117 1431
Other
Battery life 320 shots 880 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Single 2
Cost at launch $567 $2,736