Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Released October 2008
- Renewed by Sony A99
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and A900 (25MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and A900 (Full frame) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-1 was released 2 years later than the A900 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the XZ-1 grades vs the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony A900
XZ-1 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | October 2008 | Fresher by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus XZ-1
A900 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | 614k | Crisper display (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A900
XZ-1 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 provides physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony A900 has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 versus the A900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and A900 is 88 and 54 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and A900.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony A900 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 15MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern XZ-1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 6048 x 4032 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | OLED | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 117 | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 880 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Cost at launch | $567 | $2,736 |