Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3N
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Announced February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony NEX-3N, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-1 was announced 3 years earlier than the NEX-3N and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the XZ-1 grades versus the NEX-3N when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony NEX-3N
XZ-1 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus XZ-1
NEX-3N | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 25 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-3N
XZ-1 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the NEX-3N.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and NEX-3N is 88 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and NEX-3N.
Plainly, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony NEX-3N will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-1 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-01-26 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 lb) | 269g (0.59 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 480 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $567 | $399 |