Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a69e/2a69eb509c2626442e0587ba9561afe68bcfb2d0" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5R front Sony Alpha NEX-5R front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Released August 2012
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Updated by Sony NEX-5T
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-5R, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and NEX-5R (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-1 was released 19 months before the NEX-5R making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the XZ-1 scores against the NEX-5R in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony NEX-5R
XZ-1 | NEX-5R |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Olympus XZ-1
NEX-5R | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 19 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper display (+306k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-5R
XZ-1 | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 has got outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony NEX-5R has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-5R in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-1 vs the NEX-5R.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35e08/35e086fb5423e5eff1a704b3e1144acff05d415d" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and NEX-5R is 88 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0e4e/a0e4e14e2075ec19f5217913ff02a2ade344df0c" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and NEX-5R.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 because of its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sony NEX-5R will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a3ae/9a3aeabeec68bbe8efacd14a25c3b73f9db6d607" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44a50/44a50d5abf6264f6352ddeec23e42052fced8288" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 614k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | OLED | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | 117 | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 330 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $567 | $750 |