Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-F3
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Announced August 2012
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-3N
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-F3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-1 was manufactured 18 months before the NEX-F3 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the NEX-F3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony NEX-F3
XZ-1 | NEX-F3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus XZ-1
NEX-F3 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 18 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-F3
XZ-1 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has proportions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 and the NEX-F3.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and NEX-F3 is 88 and 86 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and NEX-F3.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony NEX-F3 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 614k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | OLED | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) | 314 gr (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 34 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 470 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $567 | $470 |