Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H300
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H300 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony H300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and H300 (20MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and H300 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-1 was revealed 4 years prior to the H300 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-1 scores vs the H300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony H300
XZ-1 | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus XZ-1
H300 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | January 2011 | More modern by 37 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony H300
XZ-1 | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 comes with external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony H300 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony H300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the H300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and H300 is 88 and 63 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and H300.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony H300 will deliver more detail because of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H300 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 614k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | OLED | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 8.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) | 590 grams (1.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $567 | $249 |