Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e76b5/e76b5f1031fe999502e3c5fe0f06c140249a3cfe" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front"
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Older Model is Sony HX100V
- Refreshed by Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony HX200V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and HX200V (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The XZ-1 was announced 15 months prior to the HX200V making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-1 grades vs the HX200V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony HX200V
XZ-1 | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus XZ-1
HX200V | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 15 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony HX200V
XZ-1 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 has external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 vs the HX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bd9c/5bd9c20511b6ceed53294622936e8e15f2ad7cfa" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and HX200V is 88 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4bb1/a4bb1b693ca2d6dccbeb78c0b90ce0640ad5b1fd" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and HX200V.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Sony HX200V will provide you with more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older XZ-1 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5fef/f5fefb3668341a59cabce1d9d7703a54ad87a246" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be69/1be69b9b2da060ea9ef081c20fbdd4694475b6cb" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 614k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | OLED | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 583g (1.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 450 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $567 | $480 |