Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Released August 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax Q7, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and Q7 (12MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and Q7 (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-4 was released 21 months after the Q7 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-4 matches up vs the Q7 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax Q7. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax Q7
TG-4 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | ![]() | August 2013 | More modern by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus TG-4
Q7 | TG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax Q7
TG-4 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 features external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q7 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-4 versus Pentax Q7 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-4 against the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e58d7/e58d719d2374736cf6166246259451c424f35b13" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and Q7 is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4864/d48641fad44fbb5d2a5f0066c154e042f719ab13" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and Q7.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-4 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-4 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-4 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4b93/a4b931c15862571dd97e24edaf0c64a499ca56be" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08b85/08b858607a01061677959e0a1f1b9a17854c0143" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Q7 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 250 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $379 | $480 |