Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2

Portability
80
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Introduced October 2019
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
  • Newer Model is OM System OM-5
Panasonic FP2
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and FP2 (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M5 III was announced 9 years after the FP2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M5 III grades vs the FP2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Panasonic FP2

 E-M5 III FP2 
RevealedOctober 2019January 2010Newer by 120 months
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-M5 III

 FP2 E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic FP2

 E-M5 III FP2 

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III enjoys outside measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 III vs the FP2.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and FP2 is 80 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and FP2.

As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III will have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FP2 Portrait photography factors
77
focusing manually
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
28
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Street photography with Panasonic FP2
83
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
features touch to focus
weather proofing
very good high ISO (25,600)
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competition (151 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography info
Panasonic FP2 Sports photography info
76
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
weather proofing
supports phase detect AF
terrible battery life (310 shots)
35
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
low fps (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FP2 as a Travel photography camera
77
weather proofing
supports bluetooth
features touch to focus
good megapixels (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
terrible battery life (310 shots)
56
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (151g)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FP2 Landscape photography advice
77
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather proofing
terrible battery life (310 CIPA)
33
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging information
Panasonic FP2 Vlogging information
84
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
high video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
comes with external mic port
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competition (151 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic FP2
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FP2
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2
Category Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Introduced 2019-10-17 2010-01-06
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Venus Engine IV
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 30.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.90 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 414 gr (0.91 lbs) 151 gr (0.33 lbs)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $1,199 $80