Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Superseded the Sony HX200V
- Later Model is Sony HX400V
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and HX300 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-1 was released 3 years earlier than the HX300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-1 scores vs the HX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony HX300
| XZ-1 | HX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus XZ-1
| HX300 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 614k | Sharper screen (+307k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony HX300
| XZ-1 | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 has got physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-1 versus the HX300.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and HX300 is 88 and 63 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and HX300.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony HX300 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 pounds) | 623g (1.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $567 | $339 |