Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Superseded the Sony HX200V
- Later Model is Sony HX400V
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and HX300 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-1 was released 3 years earlier than the HX300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-1 scores vs the HX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony HX300
| XZ-1 | HX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus XZ-1
| HX300 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 614k | Sharper screen (+307k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony HX300
| XZ-1 | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 has got physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-1 versus the HX300.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and HX300 is 88 and 63 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and HX300.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony HX300 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 pounds) | 623g (1.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $567 | $339 |