Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Revealed February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 Overview

Here is a complete overview of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and T900 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The XZ-1 was released 24 months later than the T900 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the XZ-1 grades versus the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony T900

 XZ-1 T900 
RevealedJanuary 2011February 2009Fresher by 24 months

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus XZ-1

 T900 XZ-1 
Display sizing3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k614kCrisper display (+308k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony T900

 XZ-1 T900 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 offers outside measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

See the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 against the T900.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and T900 is 88 and 96 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and T900.

Plainly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony T900 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger XZ-1 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony T900 as a Portrait photography camera
45
has manual focus
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
27
manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography info
Sony T900 Street photography info
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
heavier than competitors (275g)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography info
Sony T900 Sports photography info
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (320 shots)
low fps (2.0 fps)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
lacks phase detect autofocus
24
image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000 seconds)
slow fps (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography details
Sony T900 Travel photography details
62
better than average battery life (320 shots)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (275g)
low MP (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
51
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
54
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (320 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
no Time Lapse function
36
manual focus
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-1
Vlogging with Sony T900
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic jack
heavier than competitors (275 grams)
28
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony T900
 Olympus XZ-1Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-01-26 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3664 x 2752 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3.5 inches
Display resolution 614 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275 grams (0.61 lb) 143 grams (0.32 lb)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $567 $300