Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W320
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W320 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony W320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and W320 (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and W320 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-1 was released 13 months later than the W320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the XZ-1 scores vs the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony W320
XZ-1 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus XZ-1
W320 | XZ-1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony W320
XZ-1 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony W320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the W320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and W320 is 88 and 97 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and W320.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony W320 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern XZ-1 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 614k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $567 | $269 |