Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Announced February 2019
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FZ1000 II (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FZ1000 II (1") feature totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 7 years before the FZ1000 II and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the FZ1000 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
XZ-2 iHS | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FZ1000 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2019 | December 2012 | More recent by 75 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 920k | Sharper display (+320k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ1000 II
XZ-2 iHS | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 II has specifications of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") with a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the FZ1000 II.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FZ1000 II is 85 and 55 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking technical specs. The visual here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and FZ1000 II.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will resolve greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2019-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 808g (1.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 350 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $450 | $898 |