Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G9
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
62 Imaging
60 Features
90 Overall
72
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 658g - 137 x 97 x 92mm
- Introduced November 2017
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G9 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic G9, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and G9 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and G9 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 5 years earlier than the G9 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the G9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DC-G9. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic G9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic G9
XZ-2 iHS | G9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G9 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
G9 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2017 | December 2012 | Newer by 59 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic G9
XZ-2 iHS | G9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic G9 has sizing of 137mm x 97mm x 92mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 658 grams (1.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic G9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the G9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and G9 is 85 and 62 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and G9.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Panasonic G9 will result in extra detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G9 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2017-11-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,680k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 658 grams (1.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 137 x 97 x 92mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | DMW-BLF19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | Two |
Cost at launch | $450 | $1,500 |