Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH10
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
97 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 103g - 94 x 54 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH10 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FH10 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FH10 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled around the same time to the FH10 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the FH10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH10
| XZ-2 iHS | FH10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FH10 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH10
| XZ-2 iHS | FH10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | January 2013 | Similar age |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH10 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FH10 has dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 103 grams (0.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the FH10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FH10 is 85 and 97 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and FH10.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH10 will offer more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH10 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 103 gr (0.23 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 94 x 54 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 260 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $450 | $110 |
