Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d3b/58d3bced54bef37acbf33e0cc1a92af65eb0c1e4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS16
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH2, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FH2 (14MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FH2 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 24 months later than the FH2 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the FH2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH2
XZ-2 iHS | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 24 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FH2 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH2
XZ-2 iHS | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FH2 has dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the FH2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8e0b/a8e0b882d5a5110d765813b304ca6d441b05d8d3" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and FH2 is 85 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edec8/edec83d02336fef6d2fcc2d2a7c03219d5669226" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The visual here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and FH2.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FH2 will give you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9c9d/b9c9da817b4228aec520a0a386abee5b9b8668aa" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa431/fa43104d622d0ceb570324c5e4d412b94fa8e6ba" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FS16 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 270 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $450 | $149 |