Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH27
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH27 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH27 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH27, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FH27 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FH27 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 24 months after the FH27 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the FH27 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH27 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FH27 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH27
| XZ-2 iHS | FH27 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FH27 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH27
| XZ-2 iHS | FH27 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH27 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic FH27 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH27 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the FH27.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and FH27 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH27 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The picture here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and FH27.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FH27 will result in extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH27 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 250 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $450 | $229 |