Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP1 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FP1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FP1 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FP1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 2 years later than the FP1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the FP1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FP1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FP1
| XZ-2 iHS | FP1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 36 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FP1 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FP1
| XZ-2 iHS | FP1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FP1 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FP1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the FP1.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and FP1 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and FP1.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS contains the bigger sensor which should make getting bokeh easier. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $450 | $153 |
