Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP2
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FP2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FP2 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 2 years after the FP2 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the FP2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FP2
| XZ-2 iHS | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | January 2010 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FP2 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FP2
| XZ-2 iHS | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FP2 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FP2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the FP2.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FP2 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FP2.
Clearly, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FP2 will resolve greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 151g (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $450 | $80 |