Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP8
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FP8, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FP8 (12MP) is relatively close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FP8 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years after the FP8 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the FP8 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FP8
| XZ-2 iHS | FP8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 42 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FP8 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FP8
| XZ-2 iHS | FP8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FP8 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FP8 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FP8.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and FP8 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through technical specs. The image below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FP8.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS uses the bigger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF simpler. The younger XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $450 | $300 |