Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FS12 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years after the FS12 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the FS12 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FS12
| XZ-2 iHS | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | April 2009 | Newer by 45 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FS12 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FS12
| XZ-2 iHS | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the FS12.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FS12 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FS12.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact MP but different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS features the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF easier. The more modern XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 129 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $450 | $228 |