Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FX580 (12MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FX580 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 3 years after the FX580 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the FX580 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FX580
| XZ-2 iHS | FX580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FX580 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX580
| XZ-2 iHS | FX580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX580 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the FX580.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FX580 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The picture below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FX580.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS features the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler. The newer XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $450 | $499 |